Archive for August, 2009

The Valence of Truth

Truth, in an of itself, does not exist outside of our minds. It is a cloudy, oft-misused philosophical concept that, at best, helps us to clarify what we want and how we feel, but at worst is used to control and manipulate people, ourselves as often as others. People who are controlled by the truths of others are people like me, who believe that our own truth does not exist or at the very least, has the least validity of all possible truths. In that regard, then, truth is an extension of ourselves, a flyer from the sanctum of self out into the realm of the real where it fares better or worse depending on its weight.

My truth has no weight. It is an ephemeral thing that floats like smoke around me. I sense it, smell it, see it, but I cannot hold it, cannot keep it close to me. As such, the slightest interference from an outside entity will disrupt its flow, leaving me focused on someone else’s burdensome truth, while mine dissipates completely until it is as though it never existed.

It is both simple and difficult to go through life this way. The easy part is that I never have to decide anything for myself. In this world there is always someone who knows what’s best for me; there is always someone ready to offer an opinion on how I ought to be deciding or behaving. There is always someone willing to control what I think or how I act. This may not be true, but that’s the way that it feels, that at any given moment there is a certain way to act or behave that is befitting a man of my class and stature. I wrote about this at length in The Path of God, so I won’t go into it here, except to say that I have, for as long as I can remember, been at the mercy of someone else’s truth. I do not know where I learned this or how I came to believe it, except that perhaps I am built this way. It is part of the mystery of my own personal creation story (easier for me to conceive of and write about, perhaps, because my name is Adam).

The genesis of this trait, whose shadow side has for so long weakened me in the most polite and pleasing manner, is inconsequential. I do not want to spend any more time wondering (and lamenting) why I am who I am, but rather increase the weight of my truth so that it anchors me in my experience and gives me the power to shape the world in a way that is pleasing to me. It is without question in my mind that the weight of our truths gives us power in the world. The more firmly I believe my own truth, for good or for ill, the more power I have to make my life what I want it to be.

I have not consciously held that power for a long time, and for a long time before that I did not feel it was mine to wield. As a polite young man, guilt-stricken about the inherent power of being a young, white male in Western society, I continually gave my power away, ceded the truth of my life and my being to others, pretending I had no truth (no opinion, no strong feelings, no passions), or focusing only on the harmless truths, the truths of my own pain, dissatisfaction and powerlessness. These feelings were true, but they had power because I believed in their truth and their weight, stealing from the other equally valid truths of my power in the world without ever realizing who I was robbing or why. I was powerless in the world because I believed I was; I am powerless in the world because I believe I am. This belief is not an explicit one; it is an implicit belief that, through the elegant origami of my self-deception, I have folded pieces of into other truths in my life about women, authority and God, leaving me at the mercy of those who, either explicitly or intuitively, were willing to take on the burden of influencing me.

That is not a burden easily carried, though it is one that is easily taken. My wife is the current bearer of my truth, as I was taught (or taught myself) is the best way to live. It has not always been my wife, She does not know it or does not admit it to herself, and whatever her reasons they are her own, but her truth is the truth that gives my life weight and meaning, that gives momentum to our lives together. This is not the explicit truth, the view from the outside, but the implicit shape that our relationship has taken, as I have repeatedly folded myself into a shape that I believe suits her, her truth and her view of what our relationship should be. It is dark and cramped in here, and I am ready to come out.

This description of our relationship is not a truth that my wife would recognize. As I imagine her reading this, I can see her staring dumbfounded at the words, because this is not her truth, this is not the truth on her side of our codependency, nor should it be. If her truth was one of power and manipulation she would not be the woman that she imagines herself to be. And while I understand that much of this exhalation is merely the description of the prison that the prisoner has built for himself and described upon waking, I also know that beyond that lies some truth, for it is impossible to be codependent completely own my own. I do not believe that my wife is a power-hungry manipulator of people. I believe that she moves through the world with a weighty truth, whether or not this truth matches up with the way things are. I believe that I, as a person without a truth of his own, am drawn to people with weighty truth. I believe that my wife is comfortable in our relationship being the person who is right and who sets the tone without ever questioning where the roots of this comfort lie.

As uncomfortable as it is to remain under the thumb of someone else’s truth, breaking out of the cycle of codependency is more difficult. The most tempting mode of escape for me is to constantly challenge the weight of someone else’s truth. It feels good to do it, because I have lived my life in deference to the truth of others, and in some instances it really is important to challenge those truths, but ultimately this is only half of what I need to do. To question the truth of other’s is a meaningless gesture without a truth of my own to either fall back on or substitute. I know that I am not doing either gracefully. I am reactionary to the truth of others and I am slow to realizing my own truths. It can take me up to a day to realize how I feel about something, and that’s embarrassing, both to realize myself and to admit to others. It is also incredibly unsatisfying, again for me and for others, to say, “I don’t know, I’ll get back to you on that,” over and over and over again. It is, however, both satisfying and surprising to find I do have opinions on things, though I continue to feel awkward about expressing them, feeling that when I go on and on about something I know or am passionate about that I’m being long-winded or dominating the conversation. But this is the new and awkward portion of what I am doing, and I will be the graceless young antelope, I suppose, stumbling towards proficiency and hopefully someday even gracefulness.

The Path of God

I believe in God. That’s the first thing you should know about me. It, I think, surprising and somewhat embarrassing, as if in admitting this I am also admitting to cross-stitched Bible verses hanging from my walls and a smug sense of betterness at cocktail parties. I am afraid in admitting this that pictures of Yahweh will bloom in your mind like white mushrooms and spread to other less charitable places, lumping me with other people you’ve known who have believed in God, and these people you are not fond of. I am afraid, in short, that you will get the wrong idea.

So let me contextualize for a moment (or perhaps justify, the behavior is not clear in my mind). My God is not Yahweh. It is not, and has not been for a long time, built in the image of a stern patriarch frowning down upon me. I lived with that image of God for a long time, even after I forwent Church and organized Western religion, finding that I could not shake God as easily as that. It is better to say that I have unlearned that image of God and am slowly replacing it, as ants build anthills I suppose, with another version. This version is a goddess, the Goddess, and though she is not currently any more personable than my last image of God, she is certainly more forgiving and less judgmental, for which I am grateful to her.

Still, despite this slow evolution of my perception and experience of God, I am not free of Yahweh and what he represents. His lawfulness and rules based living is woven into the very fabric of my being. There is not a time I can remember when there weren’t rules to be abided by, people to be avoided because of the way that they transgressed the otherwise invisible borders that framed my every conscious movement and plotted the course of my day, my life and my eternity. These lines focused heavily around school, leading from the first grade present into the college future. Beyond that things were hazy, but I knew that after college lay gainful employment, family and church. Church was another major artery in the series of strings and lines that divided my world into what was on limits and what was off. There was no denying these lines. I could no more question the reality of these rules than I could the reality of trees or speech. They just were. They always had been, and as far as I could tell in my youth, always would be.

These lines are no less present today than they were when I was 6, 12 or 18. I still live my most of my days within the boundaries laid out by these lines. The difference now is that I am aware of them as constructs rather than as physical or metaphysical forces. I can transgress these lines, as I was always able to transgress them, at great emotional cost. There are repercussions for stepping outside the boundaries. I used to believe that the repercussions were physical danger and spiritual damnation. Now I understand these fears as tools used by society to keep all of us in our places. That is a longer discussion, but it is a way of saying that though I no longer fear that the consequences of stepping outside these lines are death and damnation, I still deal with the fear of those things when I cross these lines because I am still learning to deal with the fear of the unknown, and the unknown for me still contains death and damnation.

I think if you told me that these lines plotted out for me, since I was a very little boy, something akin to the Path of God, I would not have disagreed with you. It was nothing if not the path of the righteous man, and the righteous man walks with God. To some degree I still would not disagree with you. The lines, for the most part, lay out a safe, healthy and respectful manner of living that would serve anyone well. Be respectful, follow the rules, do what people in positions of authority tell you, work hard and take care of the ones you love. There is nothing explicitly wrong with those rules, it is the way that I was following them that really destroyed me. In the assumption that this was the Right way of doing things, in the assumption that other ways were wrong and dangerous, in the assumption of fear for my life when I transgressed those lines lay all the reasons that I was working the rules in the wrong way

In abandoning the institutions that supported those rules (family, church and school for the most part) I have learned that they are not rules. In breaking away from the path I felt was safest (ironically that path was also most full of fear) I have learned that the path of God is not a path, it is a way of walking. The path of God is not a noun it is an adjective. It is not just walking, it is the way we walk that is important.