Archive for January, 2010

The Practice of Negativity

01.25

I am a negative person.  I have perhaps always been a negative person.  The reasons are inconsequential, but that’s never stopped me from exploring them before.  My parents are both negative people.  That’s a large generalization, and the more accurate way to say it might be that they are cautious people.  They are wary of vulnerability and they are wary of excitement.  For example, this weekend I told my parents about my son’s increasing vocabulary.  My mother’s immediate response was that my peace and quiet was gone forever, and that I’ll wish he’d never started talking.  Now, I don’t think this is an incredibly irrational response, in fact, I think it’s an incredibly predictable response.  My mother, too, has been taught by her parents, in one way or another, to be cautious, and so her excitement comes out masked in sarcasm.  My response to this is sarcastic in vein as well, since it’s the language of my youth and to a large degree the language of my family.  To abandon this language, without warning, would be difficult for me and for my parents.

The truth is that I long to abandon this language of caution, I long to hear unequivocal excitement and praise from my parents.  I desperately want them to get excited about something without apology or regret.  I want them to reflect on the mistakes that they drag around behind them like a sack of broken toys, without purpose other than the reminder of the time when they did it wrong.  This sack of useless memories only serves to hold them back, to weight them down and keep them from getting carried away in their excitement.  I want them to get carried away, though it would frighten and disturb me.  I want them to love who they are and what they do.  I want this for my parents because I want it for myself.

I too carry with me a sack of leaden memories, mistakes and regrets that I sit with in the evenings and roll over in my hands, reliving my regret with a melancholy relish that is nothing if not my emotional calling card, the energy by which I have defined and delimited my identity for as long as I have had an identity to define.  My regrets are in a large way my most important memories since they are the memories of the things that were most precious to me.  I learned not to pursue these things.  I am naturally risk averse and I had no one to teach me how to handle the disappointment of trying and failing, so like most people I did away with trying where I might fail and stuck to doing what I was good at.  But achievement without risk is empty of satisfaction.  So the things that I have reacted to most strongly in life, women, jobs, opportunities, ideas, inextricably bound up in the miasma of regret from not pursuing them.  That miasma has grown and grown and now I am left with a castle of sadness as my legacy, built stone by stone from a life time of regrets.

The fact is that I am as guilty as my parents of responding to excitement with negativity.  I am not comfortable being excited, I do not know how to handle it, so I want it to be over as quickly as possible and the easiest way to do that is to kill it.  There are different ways to kill excitement, I know because I’ve been doing it for a long time.  There is the direct way, which is to directly negate the existence of the excitement by saying that it’s based purely on fiction.  There is the rational way, which is advising not to put all your eggs in one basket, we’ll see what happens, don’t get too excited now.  There is the faux excitement and then break it down little by little until there’s nothing left of the original excitement.  It’s sad, really to know how long I’ve practiced these techniques, how long I’ve lived my life cautiously, free of fear, full of regret.

My caution is nothing if not defense against disappointment.  Caution preaches the idea that we ought not get too excited about any one thing since things can change unexpectedly at any given moment leaving us disappointed.  The irony is that practice of caution is the direct opposite of what it preaches: that we DO know what’s going to happen, it’s going to be negative and I’m going to be disappointed if I get excited, caught up or involved.  I believe that I have husbanded this kind of caution for as long as I’ve lived, and that the cultivation of this energy leads only to more caution, because I am unwilling to risk the disappointment of exploring other possibilities.  To a great degree I am learning that I get what I expect and if I expect that excitement leads to disappointment, it always will.

I know that the reality behind being excited can be just as narrow minded.  I know that when I get excited about something I can focus on that possibility to the exclusion of all others.  What I am learning is the third road, the place where I am excited by the infinite number of possibilities, where I no longer see an unexpected change as a setback, and no longer see setbacks as proof that creating intention about something exciting is useless and not worthwhile.  Where the road to my goal is uncharted and I am able to purge myself of cautious expectations and say yes to unexpected possibilities without thinking of them detours.  To make the most of what’s dropped in my path whether I consider it successful or not.  I am much more comfortable failing than I am recontextualizing the disappointment of expectation into a new opportunity.  I am much happier rehashing what I could have done better than I am deciding what I can do best with what I’ve got now.  I am more comfortable in the certainty of the past than I am in the uncertainty of the present, which means that I am always existing in regret and always trying to catch up to myself.

I don’t know how to proceed from here, but how doesn’t matter.  The only how that matters is to, as Jonathan Larson often reminds me, “forget regret or life is yours to miss.”  It is a lesson I long to learn, to understand and to practice.  I have not forgotten my regret, I carry it close to my heart, the treasure of things I stood near and almost did, which is the closest I’ve been to truly living.  That is a sad thing to say, and perhaps in saying it I continue the cycle of caution and regret.  I don’t know how to cut away the strings that are keeping me bound, but I will find a way, and I will find a way soon.

Just Getting By

01.11.10

I had a realization during my meditation today.  A voice, whose, I don’t know, but certainly not one I’m familiar with, said, “Maybe it’s okay if you’re just getting by.”  I tried to shake off the thought, but it was fiester than I had anticipated and penetrated through my admittedly weak shield of mindfulness I’d created for meditation.  When it broke through in penetrated me to my core and I doubled over in my chair, momentarily broken.  I did not believe, and until that moment hadn’t ever considered, that it might be alright to just be getting by.

My wife and I are poor.  We spent the majority of our savings moving to Wales so that she could pursue her PhD in theology and I could start my own business.  These are not things that traditionally financially savvy people do, but we do not fall into that category.  We are artists, intellectuals and people of faith, and this move was motivated by those considerations and not financial ones.  This kind of decision is not uncommon in my life; I have never been motivated by financial gain.  I love having money and I love spending it, but I have never enjoyed earning, nor have I spent my life planning for it.

But, there has always been disdain for the way that I was living, a hard moral line that my lifestyle was pushing up against.  I couldn’t have articulated that moral line before today, but it has been a constant baseline, a foundation against which I’ve lived my life.  I implicitly believed that this foundation was a bulwark against loserdom; that as long as this wall of disapproval for poverty, near-poverty and life choices that did not account for long-term financial security existed it would keep me safe, from starving, from a threadbare life.  Not until today did I see just how much that bulwark was keeping out.

Most of what it was keeping out was risk.  Implicit in the composition of this wall was the truth that I could not succeed if I strayed beyond its protection.  To move beyond the wall was to venture into the world of financial risk, which was obviously well beyond my comprehension, something so daunting as to be unavigable by someone as irresponsible and useless as I obviously was.  If I was savvy enough to survive out there, then I would have easily been able to raise enough funds within the wall to escape it.  Not having done that, I believed, I was better off staying within its walls until I could.  The lie, of course, is that within the walls it’s much more difficult to raise funds, because risk is nearly impossible behind that wall.

Objectively there’s nothing wrong with the viewpoint expressed in the wall.  Financial conservatism in and of itself isn’t wrong.  My parents have fared very well for themselves utilizing this approach to money and life.  But it wasn’t something that I believed in, though I found it difficult or impossible to articulate this beyond taking shitty, getting-by jobs as a mute form of rebellion against some vague thing that my parents embodied.  In time, I found some modicum of success in the sliver of middle ground that my world view and the one I had internalized from my parents shared, working at Lehrhaus Judiaca managing their publicity and web technology, but I still wasn’t happy, though I couldn’t have explained to you why.  I know now that I wanted to be on the other side of the glass.  I didn’t want to manage graphic designers, I wanted to be the graphic designer.

Energetically I was at loggerheads with myself.  I had a deeply internalized belief that the path to Being a Good Person was a road named Financial Security Street, and yet in order to walk that road I felt I had to sacrifice a lot of what made me happy: art, inspiration, spirituality.  But neither side could best the other.  If I made too much of my art, my financial insecurity and fear around Just Getting By would kick in and I would spend some time beating up on myself, work a bit harder, and find a steady job of some sort or another.  Looking at my work history is not inspiring.  My major response to the internalized need for financial security was self-loathing.  Nothing I did, no job I had was good enough, I wasn’t doing any of the things my father suggested, I didn’t have a portfolio or a 401k, I was planning for the future and all of this was going to lead to my downfall or ruin.

I should point out here that when I speak of my father I’m talking more about my internalized version of my father than my actual dad.  My actual dad is nothing but supportive and when he talks about finances is just sharing with me what he knows.  He never pushes anything on me or at me (except for second hand toys for my son that he rummages up at thrift stores, his primary hobby), and has never openly disapproved of my life choices, many of which I believe go staunchly against his grain.  But the model that my father set for my brother and I, as dysfunctional as it was in many ways, is the one that I’ve internalized and carried with me until now.

That model was one of hard work, saving, and avoiding brand names.  We bought cheap, disposable crap for most of my growing up and didn’t ever have the best of anything.  I’m sure there was a time in my youth when we couldn’t afford it, but later, in high school, college and after, my parents could easily afford nice things, but continue to live “simply.”  Their aversion to nice things has been passed down to me, though I, am beginning to realize that I though I value living simply have no desire to purchase something because it’s inexpensive.  I grew up with things that I didn’t value because I bought what I thought we could afford, and rarely what I wanted.  All of this has contributed to the 30 years that I’ve lived financially insecure and unhappy.

Leaving Lehrhaus and moving to Wales flies in the face of everything that the wall of financial security embodies, but I was able to do it anyway, and start my own business, not because I realized that the wall was there, but because I was listening to a more seductive and powerful voice, the voice of God, the voice of my Self.  Living here without a steady job, surviving on the goodness and generosity of family, friends and God has been hard, but I’ve also been happy.  Working for myself is one of the most satisfying experiences I’ve ever had.  And the free time that comes with Just Getting By has allowed me to explore things artistically and spiritually that I would never have had time for if I was working a steady job.  I am firmly outside that bulwark that I created, and after three months of fear and loathing at being in a new place spiritually and ideologically I finally realized that, you know what, it’s alright if I’m just getting by.  In fact, it’s pretty great just getting by.  I’m really enjoying myself out here.